* Zhang Chen (chen.zh...@intel.com) wrote: > From: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com> > > When finished COLO failover, the status is FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED. > The origin codes misunderstand the FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>
Why do these 'case's have to only deal with COMPLETED - what stops the REQUIRE/ACTIVE states appearing when these routines check the status; even if those states only happen for a short amount of time? Dave > --- > migration/colo.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c > index a916dc178c..a13acac192 100644 > --- a/migration/colo.c > +++ b/migration/colo.c > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void) > } > /* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */ > qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem); > + > /* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */ > if (mis->migration_incoming_co) { > qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->migration_incoming_co); > @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp) > case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE: > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE; > break; > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE: > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED: > s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST; > break; > default: > @@ -582,7 +583,7 @@ out: > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY, > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR); > break; > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE: > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED: > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY, > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST); > break; > @@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ out: > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY, > COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR); > break; > - case FAILOVER_STATUS_REQUIRE: > + case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED: > qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY, > COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST); > break; > -- > 2.17.GIT > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK