On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/28/2011 07:21 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > What's the distinction between vm state and machine state? >> >> VM state should be invisible (except for PV devices). > > Got it. That's why I called it "emulator state" (a bit generic, but more > precise than vm state: vm_clock for example is guest-visible). > >> About 'machine', I was thinking about -M switch to specify >> the emulated machine type. > > Yes, makes sense. I actually like the name machine state, as long as you > rename what you called "virtual machine state".
OK, I'll change 'vm' to 'emulator'. Thanks for the review.
