On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 2/15/19 2:18 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:55:53 +0100 > > Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org> wrote: > > > >> On 2/15/19 12:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: > >>> The KVM ICP class isn't used anymore. Drop it. > >> > >> Isn't migration complaining ? If not, > >> > > > > Hm.. no, but why would migration complain ? > > You are changing the type name of the object being transferred: > > "icp-kcm" -> "icp"
It's a little more complex than that. The way migration works, the
state associated with the base class is transferred under the name
"icp" and the state associated with the derived class is transferred
under the name "icp-kvm".
> Isn't that an issue ?
It would be.. except that there is no extra state in the derived
class, which is why we got away with this not-very-good solution at
all in the first place.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
