On 12.02.19 20:56, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 2/12/19 11:32 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> Yes, you want round_to_odd. I suppose that's not valid for float128 right >>> now? >> >> roundAndPackFloat64() >> >> as well as >> >> roundAndPackFloat128() >> >> support it. >> >> It's not implemented for round_canonical(), round_to_int(), > > These two are easy. I think Alex and I didn't implement it in the float32/64 > rewrite because we didn't have a user. Now we will. > >> roundAndPackInt32(), roundAndPackInt64(), roundAndPackUint64(), >> roundAndPackFloat32() > > Right, these would be from the float128 side. It shouldn't be too hard... > > > r~ >
Sounds like you are volunteering to implement them? ;) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
