04.02.2019 17:55, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/2/19 11:52 PM, Cheng Chen wrote:
>> Public bug reported:
>>
>> Follow these steps to reappear the bug:
>>
>> 1. start qemu
>> 2. add persistent bitmap: '{ "execute": "block-dirty-bitmap-add",
>> "arguments": {"node": "drive-virtio-disk1","name": "bitmap0",
>> "persistent":true }}'
>> 3. kill -9 qemu (simulate Host crash, eg. lose power)
>> 4. restart qemu
>>
>> Now, the '{ "execute": "query-block" }' can't find the bitmap0. I can
>> understand at this point, because the bitmap0 has not been synchronized
>> yet.
>
> This matches my observations here:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg07700.html
>
> I'm of the opinion that updating the qcow2 headers any time a persistent
> bitmap is created or destroyed is worthwhile, even if the headers must
> still mark the bitmap as in-use. True, the crash will leave the bitmap
> as inconsistent, which is no different than if the bitmap is never
> written to the qcow2 header (when booting a new qemu, an inconsistent
> bitmap on disk has the same status as a missing bitmap - both imply that
> an incremental backup is not possible, and so a full backup is needed
> instead). But the creation of bitmaps is not a common occasion, and
> having the metadata track that a persistent bitmap has been requested
> seems like it would be useful information during a debugging session.
Even if we store them, following query-block will not show them, as
in-use bitmaps are not loaded on open (or, we should load them too).
>
>
>>
>> But, when I try to add persistent bitmap0 again: '{ "execute": "block-
>> dirty-bitmap-add", "arguments": {"node": "drive-virtio-disk1","name":
>> "bitmap0", "persistent":true }}', It failed:
>>
>> {"id":"libvirt-42","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Can't make
>> bitmap 'bitmap0' persistent in 'drive-virtio-disk1': Bitmap with the
>> same name is already stored"}}
>>
>> In other word, when qemu crash, the qcow2 image remain the incomplete
>> persistent bitmap.
Yes (if it was stored at least once, may be on previous qemu run).
>
> Does Andrey's proposed patch adding persistent bitmap details to
> 'qemu-img info' show anything after you first kill qemu?
>
> /me goes and tests...
>
> Oh weird - with Andrey's patch, we get semi-duplicated information
> during query-block (at least, after an initial clean shutdown prior to
> attempting an abrupt shutdown):
>
> {"return": [{"io-status": "ok", "device": "ide0-hd0", "locked": false,
> "removable": false, "inserted": {"iops_rd": 0, "detect_zeroes": "off",
> "image": {"virtual-size": 104857600, "filename": "file5",
> "cluster-size": 65536, "format": "qcow2", "actual-size": 208896,
> "format-specific": {"type": "qcow2", "data": {"compat": "1.1",
> "lazy-refcounts": false, "bitmaps": [{"flags": ["in-use", "auto"],
> "name": "b2", "granularity": 65536}], "refcount-bits": 16, "corrupt":
> false}}, "dirty-flag": false}, "iops_wr": 0, "ro": false, "node-name":
> "#block172", "backing_file_depth": 0, "drv": "qcow2", "iops": 0,
> "bps_wr": 0, "write_threshold": 0, "encrypted": false, "bps": 0,
> "bps_rd": 0, "cache": {"no-flush": false, "direct": false, "writeback":
> true}, "file": "file5", "encryption_key_missing": false}, "qdev":
> "/machine/unattached/device[18]", "dirty-bitmaps": [{"name": "b2",
> "status": "active", "granularity": 65536, "count": 0}, {"name": "b",
> "status": "active", "granularity": 65536, "count": 0}], "type": "unknown"}]}
>
> Note that the "format-specific" listing has a "bitmaps" entry resulting
> from Andrey's patch (which shows "auto" as one of the "flags" for any
> persistent bitmap) showing the state of the persistent bitmaps on disk;
> as well as the "dirty-bitmaps" entry that shows the state of the bitmaps
> in memory. Annoyingly, the "dirty-bitmaps" section does NOT state which
> bitmaps are persistent, and if a persistent bitmap has not yet been
> flushed to disk, then there is NO way to quickly determine which bitmaps
> are persistent and which are transient.
>
> At any rate, with qemu.git master + Andrey's patches for qemu-img info,
> I was able to reproduce a related oddity: attempting to
> block-dirty-bitmap-add a transient bitmap that has the same name as an
> existing in-use persistent bitmap succeeds; when it should have failed:
>
> $ qemu-img create -f qcow2 file5 100m
> $ ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -nographic -qmp stdio
> file5
> {'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
> {'execute':'query-block'} # learn the node name...
> {'execute':'block-dirty-bitmap-add','arguments':{'node':'#block111','name':'b1','persistent':true}}
> {'execute':'quit'}
> $ ./qemu-img info -U file5
> image: file5
> file format: qcow2
> virtual size: 100M (104857600 bytes)
> disk size: 204K
> cluster_size: 65536
> Format specific information:
> compat: 1.1
> lazy refcounts: false
> bitmaps:
> [0]:
> flags:
> [0]: auto
> name: b1
> granularity: 65536
> refcount bits: 16
> corrupt: false
> $ ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -nographic -qmp stdio
> file5
> {'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
> {'execute':'query-block'}
> {"return": [{"io-status": "ok", "device": "ide0-hd0", "locked": false,
> "removable": false, "inserted": {"iops_rd": 0, "detect_zeroes": "off",
> "image": {"virtual-size": 104857600, "filename": "file5",
> "cluster-size": 65536, "format": "qcow2", "actual-size": 208896,
> "format-specific": {"type": "qcow2", "data": {"compat": "1.1",
> "lazy-refcounts": false, "bitmaps": [{"flags": ["in-use", "auto"],
> "name": "b1", "granularity": 65536}], "refcount-bits": 16, "corrupt":
> false}}, "dirty-flag": false}, "iops_wr": 0, "ro": false, "node-name":
> "#block157", "backing_file_depth": 0, "drv": "qcow2", "iops": 0,
> "bps_wr": 0, "write_threshold": 0, "encrypted": false, "bps": 0,
> "bps_rd": 0, "cache": {"no-flush": false, "direct": false, "writeback":
> true}, "file": "file5", "encryption_key_missing": false}, "qdev":
> "/machine/unattached/device[18]", "dirty-bitmaps": [{"name": "b1",
> "status": "active", "granularity": 65536, "count": 0}], "type": "unknown"}]}
> $ kill -9 $qemupid
> $ ./qemu-img info -U file5
> image: file5
> file format: qcow2
> virtual size: 100M (104857600 bytes)
> disk size: 204K
> cluster_size: 65536
> Format specific information:
> compat: 1.1
> lazy refcounts: false
> bitmaps:
> [0]:
> flags:
> [0]: in-use
> [1]: auto
> name: b1
> granularity: 65536
> refcount bits: 16
> corrupt: false
> $ ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -nographic -qmp stdio
> file5
> {'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
> {'execute':'query-block'}
> {"return": [{"io-status": "ok", "device": "ide0-hd0", "locked": false,
> "removable": false, "inserted": {"iops_rd": 0, "detect_zeroes": "off",
> "image": {"virtual-size": 104857600, "filename": "file5",
> "cluster-size": 65536, "format": "qcow2", "actual-size": 208896,
> "format-specific": {"type": "qcow2", "data": {"compat": "1.1",
> "lazy-refcounts": false, "bitmaps": [{"flags": ["in-use", "auto"],
> "name": "b1", "granularity": 65536}], "refcount-bits": 16, "corrupt":
> false}}, "dirty-flag": false}, "iops_wr": 0, "ro": false, "node-name":
> "#block141", "backing_file_depth": 0, "drv": "qcow2", "iops": 0,
> "bps_wr": 0, "write_threshold": 0, "encrypted": false, "bps": 0,
> "bps_rd": 0, "cache": {"no-flush": false, "direct": false, "writeback":
> true}, "file": "file5", "encryption_key_missing": false}, "qdev":
> "/machine/unattached/device[18]", "type": "unknown"}]}
>
> Note - after the unclean death, the "dirty-bitmaps" entry in query-block
> is NOT present, and as a result:
>
> {'execute':'block-dirty-bitmap-add','arguments':{'node':'#block141','name':'b1'}}
> {"return": {}}
>
> Oops - we were able to add a temporary bitmap that overrides the still
> in-use persistent bitmap (which we properly ignored on loading, because
> it was marked in-use).
Yes, but you will not be able to create persistent bitmap with the same name as
in-use bitmap in the image, so, there is no actual collision.. But is not good
too.
In-use bitmaps in the image may appear only after some kind of qemu crash. Isn't
it a good reason to call qemu-img check? So, haw about just forbid to start qemu
if there are any in-use bitmaps?
>
>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> qemu version: 2.12.0 and 3.1.0, other version I does not test yet.
>
> qemu 4.0 promotes various dirty bitmap interfaces from experimental to
> supported; flaws in 3.1 are somewhat expected, but we want to make sure
> 4.0 fixes such problems, so we indeed have a bug here.
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
