On 2/1/19 1:53 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > Getting straight to the point, this is the ppc64 "boot linux console" > test, running 10 times, on top my latest rebase (e8977901b, that > includes f7b78602f). > > (01/10) boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc64_pseries: PASS > (63.07 s) ... > Then, with f7b78602f reverted: > > (01/10) boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc64_pseries: PASS > (20.54 s)
This suggests that the cluster id added in that patch is perhaps uninitialized or set incorrectly, so that we are spending much more time in code generation than we should. r~