Hi, On 1/25/19 11:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > (I'm only momentarily at the helm and will give control back to Yang after > this iteration.) > > This is still RFC mostly because of the lack of documentation, and because > only x86 is fully converted, but it's converging. Other targets still > enable embedded devices in default-configs/ instead of using "select" > directives. For many targets, the conversion will be trivial because > they only support one board. The complex ones are ARM, MIPS and PPC > of course. s390 as usual is just different in some respects, but all > of its issues are sorted out already in this series and so it's just > yet another single-board target. > > It supports defconfig (default-configs file chooses boards only) > and allnoconfig (default-configs file chooses devices too) and builds > all targets. I haven't yet checked that the configuration is the same > before and after the conversion, but at least device-introspection-test > and other qtests all pass, which did catch some errors. > > As mentioned in the previous versions, this is only a replacement > for default-configs, in order to simplify configuration and remove > the need to track dependencies between configuration symbols. In > fact, even with the current incomplete conversion the diffstat > for default-configs is already > > 31 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 241 deletions(-) > > Devices can be disabled by adding for example > > CONFIG_HPET=n > > to default-configs/i386-softmmu.mak. If you prefer they can be > listed manually and "make allnoconfig" can be executed before > building. This probably should become a configure option > "--without-default-devices" instead. > > For the previous discussions on the Kconfig design, see > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02827.html > > Patches 1-27 should probably be committed now, so please review! Yang, > once they are reviewed you can extract them and post them to the > mailing list as non-RFC! > > As to the rest, you're welcome to try them, post conversions for the > simple targets, suggest usability improvements, and whatever. Thanks to > everyone for the work on the previous iterations. It's great to see > the work on this GSoC project come back to life after five years!
How to express "depends of (TARGET_LONG_BITS > 32)"?
