On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:37:47 +0100 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public License version 2" or > "GNU Lesser General Public License version *2.1*", but there was > no "version 2.0" of the "Lesser" license. So assume that version > 2.1 is meant here. I think we can assume that. Given that there have been several of these cases (and that there's a lot of boilerplate in general): Should we adopt SPDX license identifiers for QEMU, as the Linux kernel did? They also discovered and fixed some problems/oddities while at it. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > --- > target/s390x/cc_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/fpu_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/gdbstub.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/int_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/translate.c | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Is this going through the trivial tree? If so, Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> I can also take this through the s390x tree.
