Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> writes: > Trivial patch. I've sent it yesterday but somehow it didn't > reach the list. > > This fixes the problem when qemu continues even if -drive specification > is somehow invalid, resulting in a mess. Applicable for both current > master and for stable-0.14 (and 0.13 and 0.12 as well).
Note patch doesn't apply to 0.12 and 0.13. > The prob can actually be seriuos: when you start guest with two drives > and make an error in the specification of one of them, and the guest > has something like a raid array on the two drives, guest may start failing > that array or kick "missing" drives which may result in a mess - this is > what actually happened to me, I did't want a resync at all, and a resync > resulted in re-writing (and allocating) a 4TB virtual drive I used for > testing, which in turn resulted in my filesystem filling up and whole > thing failing badly. Yes it was just testing VM, I experimented with > larger raid arrays, but the end result was quite, well, unexpected. > > Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> > --- > vl.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c > index 8bcf2ae..79f996e 100644 > --- a/vl.c > +++ b/vl.c > @@ -2098,7 +2098,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) > HD_OPTS); > break; > case QEMU_OPTION_drive: > - drive_def(optarg); > + if (drive_def(optarg) == NULL) > + exit(1); > break; > case QEMU_OPTION_set: > if (qemu_set_option(optarg) != 0) What about all the other unchecked drive_add() calls in main()?