On 03/16/11 16:52, Alon Levy wrote:
> This moves the int pipe[2] and pthread_t main data from the
> PCIQXLDevice struct to the SimpleSpiceDisplay. This will let us
> reuse it in the next patch for both -spice with no -qxl usage and
> for vga mode from qxl.
> 
> Also move the pipe creation function (which is effectively completely 
> rewritten
> by this patch anyways) from hw/qxl.c to ui/spice-display.c, since
> spice-display will depend on it after the next patch and qemu can be build
> with ui/spice-display.c in combination with no hw/qxl.c.
> ---
>  hw/qxl.c           |   22 +++++-----------------
>  hw/qxl.h           |    4 ----
>  ui/spice-display.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  ui/spice-display.h |    8 ++++++++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/qxl.c b/hw/qxl.c
> index fe4212b..201698f 100644
> --- a/hw/qxl.c
> +++ b/hw/qxl.c
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static void pipe_read(void *opaque)
>      int len;
>  
>      do {
> -        len = read(d->pipe[0], &dummy, sizeof(dummy));
> +        len = read(d->ssd.pipe[0], &dummy, sizeof(dummy));
>      } while (len == sizeof(dummy));
>      qxl_set_irq(d);
>  }
> @@ -1078,10 +1078,11 @@ static void qxl_send_events(PCIQXLDevice *d, uint32_t 
> events)
>      if ((old_pending & le_events) == le_events) {
>          return;
>      }
> -    if (pthread_self() == d->main) {
> +    if (pthread_self() == d->ssd.main) {
> +        /* running in io_thread thread */
[snip]
> diff --git a/ui/spice-display.h b/ui/spice-display.h
> index aef0464..3e6cf7c 100644
> --- a/ui/spice-display.h
> +++ b/ui/spice-display.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ typedef struct SimpleSpiceDisplay {
>      QXLRect dirty;
>      int notify;
>      int running;
> +
> +    /* thread signaling - used both in qxl (in vga mode
> +     * and in native mode) and without qxl */
> +    pthread_t          main;
> +    int                pipe[2];     /* to iothread */
>  } SimpleSpiceDisplay;

This really should be using QemuThread rather than pthread_t directly. I
am not quite sure what impact it will have on the use of pthread_self()
above, there might be a need for an additional wrapper there.

Cheers,
Jes

Reply via email to