This patch series got stuck. Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:
> Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Tue, 09/25 07:00, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>> > I'll not be involved in day-to-day qemu development. Remove >>> > myself as maintainer from the remainder of the network block drivers >>> > (and vhdx), and revert them to the general block layer maintainership. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > --- >>> > MAINTAINERS | 14 -------------- >>> > 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) >>> > >>> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>> > index e93f79672f..6ef6932628 100644 >>> > --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> > @@ -1982,28 +1982,22 @@ F: block/vmdk.c >>> > >>> > RBD >>> > M: Josh Durgin <jdur...@redhat.com> >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/rbd.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> > >>> > Sheepdog >>> > M: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hito...@lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> > M: Liu Yuan <namei.u...@gmail.com> >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > L: sheep...@lists.wpkg.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/sheepdog.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> > >>> > VHDX >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/vhdx* >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> >>> Does "S: Supported" make sense without an M:? >>> >>> > >>> > VDI >>> > M: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> >>> > @@ -2034,34 +2028,26 @@ F: docs/interop/nbd.txt >>> > T: git git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd >>> > >>> > NFS >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > M: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Maintained >>> > F: block/nfs.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> > >>> > SSH >>> > M: Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/ssh.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> > >>> > CURL >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/curl.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> >>> Likewise. >>> >>> > GLUSTER >>> > -M: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> >>> > L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >>> > S: Supported >>> > F: block/gluster.c >>> > -T: git git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block >>> >>> Likewise. >>> >>> > Null Block Driver >>> > M: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> Block drivers without an M: naturally fall under the overall maintainership >> of >> block layer (Kevin&Max), so IMO keeping the statuses is fine. Maybe CURL can >> be >> degraded to Maintained, though. > > Yes, get_maintainer.pl combines all applicable sections. Human readers > are left to wonder, unless they know to look for other matches. > > Do we want to have a dedicated network block driver submaintainer again, > if we can find one? > > Do we want to have a dedicated VHDX driver submaintainer again? Fam, > you're maintaining VMDK, could you cover VHDX as well? Fam can't. I can see two sane options for the three sections that lose their sole maintainer (VHDX, CURL, GLUSTER): * Downgrade to S: Orphan This reflects the fact that we'd like to have dedicated maintainers for them. It camouflages the fact that the "Block layer core" maintainers pick up the slack. * Delete The opposite. Kevin, Max, please pick your poison, or suggest one you find tastier.
