On 2018-12-12 12:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/12/18 16:38, Thomas Huth wrote: >> I did not do a very detailed review, but from a quick glance, this looks >> quite good to me already (apart from the few minor issues that I've >> mentioned above) >> >> Thomas > > Good, if this is okay for you, my plan is the following: > > - send patches 1-18 in my next pull request to Peter > > - send patches 15-19 for review as v2, for inclusion in your qtest tree > > - once that is done and the patches are included in your tree, send the > more "boring" patches 20-71 directly to you as a pull request, basically > the same as in this submission only with checkpatch fixed.
Sounds like a plan, yes. (and yes, I still plan to review the remaining patches, I just did not have enough spare time for that yet ...) Thomas
