On 2018-12-06 21:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/12/18 17:15, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
>>> - for (j = 0; j < 256; j++) {
>>> - uint32_t a = readl(s->memory.regions[i].guest_phys_addr + j*4);
>>> + for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) {
>>> + uint32_t a = readb(s->memory.regions[i].guest_phys_addr + j);
>> Can't you simply use memread() intead?
>
> Yes, I guess I could do memread + memcmp, but I wanted to change the
> code as little as possible here.OK, fair. Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
