>
> As more flag parameters besides the existing 'share' are going to be
> added to qemu_ram_alloc_from_{file,fd}(), let's swith 'share' to a
> 'flags' parameters in advance, so as to ease the further additions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zh...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> exec.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 273f668..e92a7da 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -1810,6 +1810,7 @@ static void *file_ram_alloc(RAMBlock *block,
> ram_addr_t memory,
> int fd,
> bool truncate,
> + uint32_t flags,
> Error **errp)
> {
> void *area;
> @@ -1859,7 +1860,7 @@ static void *file_ram_alloc(RAMBlock *block,
> perror("ftruncate");
> }
>
> - area = qemu_ram_mmap(fd, memory, block->mr->align, block->flags);
> + area = qemu_ram_mmap(fd, memory, block->mr->align, flags);
I think this change can be squashed with patch2 unless I am not missing
anything here.
> if (area == MAP_FAILED) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> "unable to map backing store for guest RAM");
> @@ -2278,7 +2279,8 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_from_fd(ram_addr_t size,
> MemoryRegion *mr,
> new_block->used_length = size;
> new_block->max_length = size;
> new_block->flags = ram_flags;
> - new_block->host = file_ram_alloc(new_block, size, fd, !file_size, errp);
> + new_block->host = file_ram_alloc(new_block, size, fd, !file_size,
> + ram_flags, errp);
> if (!new_block->host) {
> g_free(new_block);
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
