On 11/22/2018 11:54 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h 
b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index 078e46f9623d..a6f9f84526e2 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -3,9 +3,11 @@
   * Private stuff for vfio_ccw driver
   *
   * Copyright IBM Corp. 2017
+ * Copyright Red Hat, Inc. 2018
   *
   * Author(s): Dong Jia Shi<bjsdj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
   *            Xiao Feng Ren<renxi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ *            Cornelia Huck<coh...@redhat.com>
   */
#ifndef_VFIO_CCW_PRIVATE_H_
@@ -19,6 +21,38 @@
  #include "css.h"
  #include "vfio_ccw_cp.h"
+#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT 40
+#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(off)  (off >> VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT)
+#define VFIO_CCW_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index)        ((u64)(index) << 
VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT)
+#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_MASK   (((u64)(1) << VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT) - 1)
+

Why is the offset shift 40? I know vfio-pci is also using the same offset shift, but I am curious about the reasoning behind why we are using this? :)


Reply via email to