Hi Gerd,

On 22/11/18 14:32, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Guest writes to a readonly register trigger the assert in
> intel_hda_reg_write().  Add a check and just ignore them.

Is this 3.1 material? It seems to apply.

> 
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628433
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/audio/intel-hda.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/audio/intel-hda.c b/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
> index 23a2cf6484..066532713c 100644
> --- a/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
> +++ b/hw/audio/intel-hda.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,10 @@ static void intel_hda_reg_write(IntelHDAState *d, const 
> IntelHDAReg *reg, uint32
>      if (!reg) {
>          return;
>      }
> +    if (!reg->wmask) {
> +        /* read-only register */

Can you add:

           qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
                         "intel-hda: Register %s is read-only\n",
                         reg->name);

Regardless:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>

> +        return;
> +    }
>  
>      if (d->debug) {
>          time_t now = time(NULL);
> 

Reply via email to