Hi,
On 2018-11-22 00:31, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> These machines had names that were too general: there are many E
> and U machines, and it's easy for users to get confused about which one
> is which. The one configuration that can faithfully match an existing
> ASIC-based board has been renamed to 'sifive-hifive1', we'll work
> through the emulation fidelity issues apparent in the other targets
> before adding machines for those.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
> ---
> hw/riscv/sifive_e.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> hw/riscv/sifive_u.c | 2 ++
> qemu-deprecated.texi | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> index cb513cc3bb50..439d20e0efe7 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void sifive_mmio_emulate(MemoryRegion *parent, const
> char *name,
> memory_region_add_subregion(parent, offset, mock_mmio);
> }
>
> -static void riscv_sifive_e_init(MachineState *machine)
> +static void riscv_sifive_hifive1_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> const struct MemmapEntry *memmap = sifive_e_memmap;
>
> @@ -135,6 +135,17 @@ static void riscv_sifive_e_init(MachineState *machine)
> }
> }
>
> +static void riscv_sifive_e_init(MachineState *machine)
> +{
> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> + warn_report("The sifive_e machine is deprecated in favor of
> sifive-hifive1");
> +#else
> + warn_report("The sifive_e machine is deprecated.");
> +#endif
> +
> + return riscv_sifive_hifive1_init(machine);
> +}
> +
> static void riscv_sifive_e_soc_init(Object *obj)
> {
> SiFiveESoCState *s = RISCV_E_SOC(obj);
> @@ -213,13 +224,24 @@ static void riscv_sifive_e_soc_realize(DeviceState
> *dev, Error **errp)
>
> static void riscv_sifive_e_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
> {
> - mc->desc = "RISC-V Board compatible with SiFive E SDK";
> + mc->desc = "(deprecated) RISC-V Board compatible with SiFive E SDK";
> mc->init = riscv_sifive_e_init;
> mc->max_cpus = 1;
> }
>
> DEFINE_MACHINE("sifive_e", riscv_sifive_e_machine_init)
>
> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> +static void riscv_sifive_hifive1_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
> +{
> + mc->desc = "SiFive's HiFive1 Development Board";
> + mc->init = riscv_sifive_hifive1_init;
> + mc->max_cpus = 1;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_MACHINE("sifive-hifive1", riscv_sifive_hifive1_machine_init)
> +#endif
> +
> static void riscv_sifive_e_soc_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> index ef07df244241..0ce6a9dd2609 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct
> MemmapEntry *memmap,
>
> static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> + warn_report("The sifive_u machine is deprecated.");
FWIW, you can also simply set MachineClass->deprecation_reason nowadays
instead of manually issuing a warn_report() and tweaking the description
... that would be a little bit easier and is in sync with the other
deprecated boards (see e.g. commit 08fe68244 or 54c86f5a4844d51 for
other examples).
Thomas
