On 11/16/18 2:13 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > This allows us to discard most TBs; in the example above, > we end up *not* discarding only ~70 TBs, that is we end up keeping > only 70/2500 = 2.8% of the TBs that we'd discard without OOL.
Thanks. When I apply this I think I'll rename "n_ool_thunks" to "ool_generation". We don't care about the absolute count, but any change. r~
