David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> writes:
> Basically copy all int64 list tests but adapt them to work on uint64
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/test-string-input-visitor.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/test-string-input-visitor.c
> b/tests/test-string-input-visitor.c
> index 2f6360e9ca..731094f789 100644
> --- a/tests/test-string-input-visitor.c
> +++ b/tests/test-string-input-visitor.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ static void test_visitor_in_intList(TestInputVisitorData
> *data,
> 6, 7, 8 };
> int64_t expect2[] = { 32767, -32768, -32767 };
> int64_t expect3[] = { INT64_MIN, INT64_MAX };
> - uint64_t expect4[] = { UINT64_MAX };
> Error *err = NULL;
> int64List *res = NULL;
> Visitor *v;
> @@ -129,9 +128,6 @@ static void test_visitor_in_intList(TestInputVisitorData
> *data,
> "-9223372036854775808,9223372036854775807");
> check_ilist(v, expect3, ARRAY_SIZE(expect3));
>
> - v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "18446744073709551615");
> - check_ulist(v, expect4, ARRAY_SIZE(expect4));
> -
Hmm. Testing behavior for this input is still worthwhile, isn't it?
The use of check_ulist() here is admittedly unclean.
> /* Empty list */
>
> v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "");
> @@ -174,6 +170,71 @@ static void test_visitor_in_intList(TestInputVisitorData
> *data,
> visit_end_list(v, NULL);
> }
>
> +static void test_visitor_in_uintList(TestInputVisitorData *data,
> + const void *unused)
> +{
> + uint64_t expect1[] = { 1, 2, 0, 2, 3, 4, 20, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2, 3, 4,
> 5,
Please wrap this line a bit earlier.
> + 6, 7, 8 };
> + uint64_t expect2[] = { 32767, -32768, -32767 };
> + uint64_t expect3[] = { UINT64_MAX };
> + Error *err = NULL;
> + uint64List *res = NULL;
> + Visitor *v;
> + uint64_t val;
> +
> + /* Valid lists */
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "1,2,0,2-4,20,5-9,1-8");
> + check_ulist(v, expect1, ARRAY_SIZE(expect1));
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "32767,-32768--32767");
> + check_ulist(v, expect2, ARRAY_SIZE(expect2));
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "18446744073709551615");
> + check_ulist(v, expect3, ARRAY_SIZE(expect3));
Test behavior for large negative numbers?
> +
> + /* Empty list */
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "");
> + visit_type_uint64List(v, NULL, &res, &error_abort);
> + g_assert(!res);
> +
> + /* Not a list */
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "not an uint list");
> +
> + visit_type_uint64List(v, NULL, &res, &err);
> + error_free_or_abort(&err);
> + g_assert(!res);
> +
> + /* Unvisited list tail */
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "0,2-3");
> +
> + visit_start_list(v, NULL, NULL, 0, &error_abort);
> + visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &val, &error_abort);
> + g_assert_cmpuint(val, ==, 0);
> + visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &val, &error_abort);
> + g_assert_cmpuint(val, ==, 2);
> +
> + visit_check_list(v, &err);
> + error_free_or_abort(&err);
> + visit_end_list(v, NULL);
> +
> + /* Visit beyond end of list */
> +
> + v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "0");
> +
> + visit_start_list(v, NULL, NULL, 0, &error_abort);
> + visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &val, &err);
> + g_assert_cmpuint(val, ==, 0);
> + visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &val, &err);
> + error_free_or_abort(&err);
> +
> + visit_check_list(v, &error_abort);
> + visit_end_list(v, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static void test_visitor_in_bool(TestInputVisitorData *data,
> const void *unused)
> {
> @@ -334,6 +395,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> &in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_int);
> input_visitor_test_add("/string-visitor/input/intList",
> &in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_intList);
> + input_visitor_test_add("/string-visitor/input/uintList",
> + &in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_uintList);
> input_visitor_test_add("/string-visitor/input/bool",
> &in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_bool);
> input_visitor_test_add("/string-visitor/input/number",
