On 03/02/11 11:42, Dor Laor wrote: > On 03/02/2011 12:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote: >>> I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more >>> complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and >>> contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for >>> reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes. >>> Adding spice-devel to the discussion. >> >> Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require >> moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists. > > Isn't it simpler to ask the spice list maintainer (Alon Levy, CCed) to > do it?
We cannot have a discussion on a mailing list if we constantly have to wait for the list maintainer to approve it. There is really zero justification for closing a development list of an open source project. Spam is handled in other ways, this doesn't solve it. Cheers, Jes
