When populating id registers from kvm, on a host that doesn't support
aarch32 mode at all, aa32_arm_div will not be supported either.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
"Tested" on an APM Mustang, which does support AArch32. I'm not
sure, off hand, which cpu(s) don't have it, and Alex didn't say
in his bug report. Tsk tsk. ;-)
r~
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 5 +++++
target/arm/cpu.c | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 895f9909d8..4521ad5ae8 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3300,6 +3300,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fp16(const
ARMISARegisters *id)
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, FP) == 1;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_a32(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, EL0) == 2;
+}
+
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sve(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE) != 0;
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index e08a2d2d79..988d97d1f1 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -828,8 +828,16 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
**errp)
* include the various other features that V7VE implies.
* Presence of EL2 itself is ARM_FEATURE_EL2, and of the
* Security Extensions is ARM_FEATURE_EL3.
+ *
+ * V7VE requires ARM division. However, there exist AArch64 cpus
+ * without AArch32 support. When KVM queries ID_ISAR0_EL1 on such
+ * a host, the value is UNKNOWN. Similarly, we cannot check
+ * ID_AA64PFR0 without AArch64 support. Check everything in order.
*/
- assert(cpu_isar_feature(arm_div, cpu));
+ if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)
+ && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_a32, cpu)) {
+ assert(cpu_isar_feature(arm_div, cpu));
+ }
set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_LPAE);
set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7);
}
--
2.17.2
