Hi Richard,
> > Option 3: Extend the mips_opcode::membership field.
>
> It's trivial to extend the field to uint64_t.
Is the membership field intended to be used? The opcodes for CLZ and CLO
clash with the R5900 opcodes for MADD1 and MADDU1, resulting in incorrect
disassembly of MADD1 and MADDU1. For example:
0x70853020 madd1 a2,a0,a1 disassembles into clz a2 or a1,a0
0x70853021 maddu1 a2,a0,a1 disassembles into clo a2 or a1,a0
(CLZ and CLO are members of I32|N55, whereas MADD1 and MADDU1 are EE.)
Fredrik
--- a/disas/mips.c
+++ b/disas/mips.c
@@ -2549,12 +2553,16 @@ const struct mips_opcode mips_builtin_opcodes[] =
{"madd", "s,t", 0x70000000, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|WR_HILO|IS_M,
0, G1 },
{"madd", "7,s,t", 0x70000000, 0xfc00e7ff, MOD_a|RD_s|RD_t, 0,
D33 },
{"madd", "d,s,t", 0x70000000, 0xfc0007ff, RD_s|RD_t|WR_HILO|WR_d|IS_M,
0, G1 },
+{"madd1", "s,t", 0x70000020, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s | RD_t | WR_HILO | IS_M, 0, EE },
+{"madd1", "d,s,t", 0x70000020, 0xfc0007ff, RD_s | RD_t | WR_HILO | WR_d |
IS_M, 0, EE },
{"maddp", "s,t", 0x70000441, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|MOD_HILO,
0, SMT },
{"maddu", "s,t", 0x0000001d, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|WR_HILO,
0, L1 },
{"maddu", "s,t", 0x70000001, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|MOD_HILO,
0, I32|N55 },
{"maddu", "s,t", 0x70000001, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|WR_HILO|IS_M,
0, G1 },
{"maddu", "7,s,t", 0x70000001, 0xfc00e7ff, MOD_a|RD_s|RD_t, 0,
D33 },
{"maddu", "d,s,t", 0x70000001, 0xfc0007ff, RD_s|RD_t|WR_HILO|WR_d|IS_M,
0, G1 },
+{"maddu1", "s,t", 0x70000021, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s | RD_t | WR_HILO | IS_M, 0, EE
},
+{"maddu1", "d,s,t", 0x70000021, 0xfc0007ff, RD_s | RD_t | WR_HILO | WR_d |
IS_M, 0, EE },
{"madd16", "s,t", 0x00000028, 0xfc00ffff, RD_s|RD_t|MOD_HILO, 0,
N411 },
{"max.ob", "X,Y,Q", 0x78000007, 0xfc20003f, WR_D|RD_S|RD_T|FP_D, 0,
MX|SB1 },
{"max.ob", "D,S,T", 0x4ac00007, 0xffe0003f, WR_D|RD_S|RD_T, 0,
N54 },
