Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:
> On aa64, "cross-compiling" to aa32, with > > CC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc So this is different from ./configure --cross-cc=arch-linux-gnueabihf- > > configure determines > > aarch64-linux-user/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST="aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc" > aarch64-linux-user/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST_STATIC=y > aarch64-softmmu/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST="aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc" > aarch64-softmmu/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST_STATIC=y > arm-linux-user/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST="cc" > arm-linux-user/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST_STATIC=y > arm-softmmu/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST="cc" > arm-softmmu/config-target.mak:CROSS_CC_GUEST_STATIC=y > > which results in > > BUILD arm guest-tests with cc > cc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-marm’; did you mean ‘-fasm’? > > Because of course cc is the aa64 host compiler. Hmm the build target is determined by check_define which uses $cc so I'm guessing all those setting cross_FOO to host_cc should be using cc instead? In fact looking deeper I'm not sure what HOST_CC is meant to be used for. We export it to make but the only place I can find it in the source tree is: $(feat-dst)gen-features: $(feat-src)gen-features.c $(call quiet-command,$(HOST_CC) $(QEMU_INCLUDES) -o $@ $<,"CC","$(TARGET_DIR)gen-features") As part of s390x - weird. > > > r~ -- Alex Bennée