On Oct 17 14:14, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/17/18 1:25 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote: > > I suppose pmcrn (the local variable) should've been set to 0 before this > > patch and updated here to be 4. > > That's plausible. > > > Anyway, by splitting these patches apart, my intention was to separate > > the plumbing work from turning on the water. If you believe it is better > > to do both in the same patch, I'll make that change for v7. > > Fair. I'll let Peter weigh in for final decision.
At a minimum, I've updated my local tree so that pmcrn is initially set to 0 in 'target/arm: Finish implementation of PM[X]EVCNTR and PM[X]EVTYPER' and updated to 4 in this patch. And I'll squash them instead if that ends up being the decision. -Aaron