> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com] > On 17/10/2018 13:38, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com] > >> On 17/10/2018 11:53, Artem Pisarenko wrote: > >>> See my last comment in bug report. This kind of modification, even > >>> adapted to changed function name, doesn't solve issue. > >>> I thought long time that it does, but once I catched qemu with a hang. > >>> And of course, I wasn't able to reproduce it. So it just better hides > >>> issue. > >>> Take a look at alternative solution from > >>> QBox: > >>> https://git.greensocs.com/qemu/qbox/commit/a8ed106032e375e715a531d6e93e4d9ec295dbdb > >>> I didn't catched fail with it (yet). > > > > Tried to test it, but rr seems to be broken again. > > I'll try to bisect now. > > Can we add a test that runs with "make check" and covers the basics of > record/replay's cpus.c bits?
I thought Alex is trying to create some tests. Alex, am I right? Pavel Dovgalyuk
