On 02/21/11 14:36, Michael Roth wrote: > On 02/21/2011 02:32 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> Well that isn't really different from the current setup - if QEMU >> migrates, the admin tool has to connect to the new QEMU process and >> issue the fsthaw command there instead. >> > > Another thing to consider is that virtagent is bi-directional, and may > be tracking the state of state-full RPCs on behalf of the guest client, > just as the guest daemon may be tracking the state of stateful RPCs on > behalf of the host client. We cannot maintain consistent state without > migrating the host-side state information along with the guest.
What kinda of usages do you expect to need to preserve state like this? It seems a bad solution to me for the guest to be able to rely on state in the host like this. Cheers, Jes
