On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:54:40PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote: 11;rgb:ffff/ffff/ffff> spapr_init_cpus() currently creates spapr-cpu-core objects via > object_new() and setting their realized property to true. This leaves > their reference count at two, because object_new() adds an initial > reference and the realization attaches them to a default parent object > which also increments the reference count. > > This causes a problem if one of these cores is hot unplugged: no > delete event is generated for it because it's reference count doesn't > reach zero when it is detached from it's parent. > > Correct this by adding a call to object_unref() in spapr_init_cpus(). > > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobr...@linux.ibm.com>
Applied to ppc-for-3.1.
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 0d032a1ad0..fbb00f0c56 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -2502,6 +2502,8 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> object_property_set_int(core, core_id, CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
> &error_fatal);
> object_property_set_bool(core, true, "realized", &error_fatal);
> +
> + object_unref(core);
> }
> }
> }
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
