Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > On 08/08/2018 07:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> escaped_string() first tests double quoted strings, then repeats a few >> tests with single quotes. Repeat all of them: store the strings to >> test without quotes, and wrap them in either kind of quote for >> testing. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> --- >> tests/check-qjson.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) >> > >> struct { >> - const char *encoded; >> - const char *decoded; >> + /* Content of JSON string to parse with qobject_from_json() */ >> + const char *json_in; >> + /* Expected parse output; to unparse with qobject_to_json() */ >> + const char *utf8_out; >> int skip; > > Instead of int skip (and why is that not a bool?),
Ask Anthony ;) > would it be better > to have an optional const char *json_out? > >> + for (i = 0; test_cases[i].json_in; i++) { >> + for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) { >> + cstr = from_json_str(test_cases[i].json_in, &error_abort, j); >> + g_assert_cmpstr(qstring_get_try_str(cstr), >> + ==, test_cases[i].utf8_out); >> + if (test_cases[i].skip == 0) { >> + jstr = to_json_str(cstr); >> + g_assert_cmpstr(jstr, ==, test_cases[i].json_in); >> + g_free(jstr); > > and here, write g_assert_cmpstr(jstr, ==, test_cases[i].json_out ?: > test_cases[i].json_in)? After all, the reason we're skipping is > because there are some cases of multiple inputs that get canonicalized > to constant output, such as " " vs. "\u0020", or "\\'" vs. "'". This would additionally test that qobject_from_json() correctly maps '/' and ' ' to themselves. Marginal. If we want it, then comparing jstr to cstr if skip would do. Dunno.