On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:39:31PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Given our issues with failing disassembly we could try and re-use the > decode tree data to output what instruction is being decoded. This > will be used if registered as a fall-back for when the "proper" > disassembler fails to decode an instruction. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
I don't have an opinion on the approach you are taking, but the Python code you are adding is consistent with the existing style of the script. That said, I find the existing code full of output() calls very hard to read. If anybody wants to volunteer to improve the readability of the output generation, it would be welcome. Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> -- Eduardo
