On 5 August 2018 at 16:38, BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote: > Now that it looks like we'll have an rc4 due to other fixes can these be > included as well despite not being regressions? These may not have been > serious enough to fix when we wouldn't have rc4 otherwise but holding on to > broken implementation just because they were also broken in the previous > release does not make sense if we'll have another rc anyway.
I'm considering it, yes, but it increases risk, so it is not a completely trivial decision. (All changes later in the release cycle increase the risk of something unexpected breaking as a result of the change.) thanks -- PMM
