On Mon 30 Jul 2018 02:28:28 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> > Also, 512 should be BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE.
>> 
>> I was surprised that it's not, but it's 512 also in two other places,
>> including in qcow2_co_truncate itself. So I decided to keep
>> that. Probably would be better if I'd repair it in the other places
>> instead. :)
>
> Yeah, or at least not introduce new places with a literal 512.

I have a few patches already in my queue to replace these literals with
BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, so no need to spend time with the existing cases, I
can take care of that.

For new cases I agree with Kevin that you should always use
BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE.

Berto

Reply via email to