>> >>> Maybe add a comment that for kvm we try the host model, and only that >>> can fail (i.e., for tcg this will always work)? >> >> "we expect only errors under KVM, when we actually query the kernel" > > "We expect errors only under KVM, where we actually query the kernel" > > ?
Sure, maybe you can fit it into one line (which is what I tried). > > If nobody else has further comments, I can squash in the change and > queue it for 3.1. I'll let it sit for a bit longer on the list, though. If I don't have to resend, can you fixup the subject "s390x/cpumodel: ..." ? Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
