On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> We see various failures on Travis so lets just double the timeout and
>>> see if that makes them go away.
>>
>> This is just waiting for the thread to start and open a socket. It
>> shouldn't be a problem to wait longer, but do you have a Travis error
>> log?
>
> For example:
>
> https://travis-ci.org/qemu/qemu/jobs/400436724#L8971
>
> GTESTER check-qtest-i386
> **
> ERROR:tests/tpm-emu.c:27:tpm_emu_test_wait_cond: code should not be reached
>
thanks, what about increasing the timeout to 30s ? I am afraid x2
might not be enough for such overloaded systems.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> tests/tpm-emu.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/tpm-emu.c b/tests/tpm-emu.c
>>> index 8c2bd53cad..308f1884f6 100644
>>> --- a/tests/tpm-emu.c
>>> +++ b/tests/tpm-emu.c
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>>>
>>> void tpm_emu_test_wait_cond(TestState *s)
>>> {
>>> - gint64 end_time = g_get_monotonic_time() + 5 * G_TIME_SPAN_SECOND;
>>> + gint64 end_time = g_get_monotonic_time() + 10 * G_TIME_SPAN_SECOND;
>>>
>>> g_mutex_lock(&s->data_mutex);
>>> if (!g_cond_wait_until(&s->data_cond, &s->data_mutex, end_time)) {
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
--
Marc-André Lureau
