On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:28:17AM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote: > On 2018-07-03 12:58:25 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote: > > My point with these two questions is that since this patchset is > > defining external interfaces -- with guest OS, with management layer -- > > This patch set is not defining any external interfaces. All this is doing > is provide the means and locations to store the "group identifier". How > that info will be used, I thought, should be another patch set.
Device properties are a part of the interface to the management layer. PCI vendor capabilities are a part of the interface to the guest OS. So yes, I think it makes sense to have at least a rough plan on how it's going to be used. Thanks, Roman.