On 07/01/2018 04:44 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 28/06/2018 à 05:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>> Suggested-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>> ---
>>  linux-user/strace.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-user/strace.c b/linux-user/strace.c
>> index bd897a3f20..b43a21f48b 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/strace.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/strace.c
>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ UNUSED static void print_string(abi_long, int);
>>  UNUSED static void print_buf(abi_long addr, abi_long len, int last);
>>  UNUSED static void print_raw_param(const char *, abi_long, int);
>>  UNUSED static void print_timeval(abi_ulong, int);
>> +UNUSED static void print_timezone(abi_ulong, int);
>>  UNUSED static void print_number(abi_long, int);
>>  UNUSED static void print_signal(abi_ulong, int);
>>  UNUSED static void print_sockaddr(abi_ulong addr, abi_long addrlen);
>> @@ -1182,6 +1183,25 @@ print_timeval(abi_ulong tv_addr, int last)
>>          gemu_log("NULL%s", get_comma(last));
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void
>> +print_timezone(abi_ulong tz_addr, int last)
>> +{
>> +    if (tz_addr) {
>> +        struct target_timezone *tz;
>> +
>> +        tz = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, tz_addr, sizeof(*tz), 1);
>> +        if (!tz) {
> 
> you should use print_pointer(tz_addr, last) instead of ignoring the value.

I copied print_timeval(). Same applies there then. I'll update both.

Thanks,

Phil.

Reply via email to