On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 18 June 2018 at 17:17, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> There is no obvious reason to have a loop counter. This limits from
>> reading several megabytes large buffers in one go, since socket
>> read/write usually have a limit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> chardev/char-fe.c | 6 +-----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/chardev/char-fe.c b/chardev/char-fe.c
>> index b1f228e8b5..f158f158f8 100644
>> --- a/chardev/char-fe.c
>> +++ b/chardev/char-fe.c
>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ int qemu_chr_fe_write_all(CharBackend *be, const uint8_t
>> *buf, int len)
>> int qemu_chr_fe_read_all(CharBackend *be, uint8_t *buf, int len)
>> {
>> Chardev *s = be->chr;
>> - int offset = 0, counter = 10;
>> + int offset = 0;
>> int res;
>
> Subject says "qemu_char_fe_write_all()" but patch is changing
> qemu_chr_fe_read_all()...
>
indeed, fixed.
thanks
--
Marc-André Lureau
