We can reuse pc_dimm_get_memory_region() now, as both functions are
(besides the assert which is also correct), equal.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
hw/mem/pc-dimm.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
index 9a0da5d441..bc79dd04d8 100644
--- a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
+++ b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
@@ -219,11 +219,6 @@ static MemoryRegion
*pc_dimm_get_memory_region(PCDIMMDevice *dimm)
return host_memory_backend_get_memory(dimm->hostmem);
}
-static MemoryRegion *pc_dimm_get_vmstate_memory_region(PCDIMMDevice *dimm)
-{
- return host_memory_backend_get_memory(dimm->hostmem);
-}
-
static uint64_t pc_dimm_md_get_addr(const MemoryDeviceState *md)
{
const PCDIMMDevice *dimm = PC_DIMM(md);
@@ -282,7 +277,7 @@ static void pc_dimm_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
dc->desc = "DIMM memory module";
ddc->get_memory_region = pc_dimm_get_memory_region;
- ddc->get_vmstate_memory_region = pc_dimm_get_vmstate_memory_region;
+ ddc->get_vmstate_memory_region = pc_dimm_get_memory_region;
mdc->get_addr = pc_dimm_md_get_addr;
/* for a dimm plugged_size == region_size */
--
2.17.1
