* Stefan Hajnoczi (stefa...@gmail.com) wrote:
> David Gilbert previously suggested a memory access interface. I guess
> it would look something like this:
>
> typedef struct {
> void (*memset)(void *s, int c, size_t n);
> void (*memcpy)(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> } MemoryOperations;
>
> That way code doesn't need if (pmem) A else B. It can just do
> mem_ops->foo(). Have you looked into this idea?
Yep, it really needs to be less invasive in the migration code;
I think a set of ops like that would make it much less painful.
> Also, there was a discussion about leaving the code unchanged but adding
> an nvdimm_flush() call at the very end of migration. I think someone
> benchmarked it but can't find the email. Please post a link or
> summarize the results, because that approach would be much less
> invasive. Thanks!
Dave
> Stefan
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
