On 31 May 2018 at 10:54, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 May 2018 at 17:58, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Go ahead and apply it through the ARM tree. Thanks! > > It needs a v2 (there are some patches that need fixing), > and some of the tail end of the patchset hasn't been reviewed, > and I'm not sure if we have consensus on the IOMMU API changes > completely yet. But if you're happy we're going in the right > direction I can apply 1-13 via target-arm.next (that's the > "plumb TxAttrs through various functions" patches). That will > reduce the size of the patchset and make conflicts less likely.
I'm putting patches 1-13 (initial plumbing) and 22 (adding VMSTATE_BOOL_SUB_ARRAY) into target-arm.next. The rest will need a respin to fix minor nits and some conflicts with things that are now in master. thanks -- PMM
