On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:01:57AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:30:22AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:28:37AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:39:52PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > int monitor_fdset_get_fd(int64_t fdset_id, int flags)
> > > > {
> > > > -#ifndef _WIN32
> > > > +#ifdef _WIN32
> > > > + return -ENOENT;
> > >
> > > stubs/fdset.c:monitor_fdset_get_fd() should return -ENOENT instead of -1
> > > now.
> >
> > Yes that's intended. That's actually a suggestion from Markus since
> > changing the return code will simplify the code.
>
> No, I understand that part. I'm pointing out that
> stubs/fdset.c:monitor_fdset_get_fd() still returns -1 because it was not
> updated by this patch.
>
> Since this patch changes the return value to -errno, the stub function
> should be updated to return a sensible -errno value too.
Sorry I overlooked. You are right, I'll touch that up.
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
