On 15/05/2018 14:00, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Replay data is not considered a possible attack vector; add a model that >> does not use getc so that "tainted data" warnings are suppressed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> >> --- >> scripts/coverity-model.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/coverity-model.c b/scripts/coverity-model.c >> index c702804f41..576f48de33 100644 >> --- a/scripts/coverity-model.c >> +++ b/scripts/coverity-model.c >> @@ -103,6 +103,19 @@ static int get_keysym(const name2keysym_t *table, > /* Tainting */ > > typedef struct {} name2keysym_t; > static int get_keysym(const name2keysym_t *table, > const char *name) > { > int result; > if (result > 0) { > __coverity_tainted_string_sanitize_content__(name); > return result; > } else { > return 0; >> } >> } >> >> + > > Does the new model go under /* Tainting */ ?
Yes, it does. Any chance you can do the change yourself?... Paolo > If yes, I'd like to have just one blank line here. > >> +/* Replay data is considered trusted. */ > > If no, I'd like to insert one here. > >> +uint8_t replay_get_byte(void) >> +{ >> + uint8_t byte = 0; >> + if (replay_file) { >> + uint8_t c; >> + byte = c; >> + } >> + return byte; >> +} >> + >> + >> /* >> * GLib memory allocation functions. >> *