Le 25 janv. 2011 à 23:24, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:05, Brian Jackson wrote: >> On 1/24/2011 1:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 17:44, Brian Jackson wrote: >>>> C. They have strange rules about groups and channel ownership >>> >>> ive never had a problem >> >> Yeah, this was a bit vague. I think the biggest issue is that nobody that's >> actually involved in qemu currently has any ability to do anything with the >> #qemu@freenode. So it's either make a #therealqemu@freenode, try to convince >> freenode that the current developers should have access, or move to a >> network that is friendlier to it's users. Guess which one is easiest? > > so from your point, it's more a matter of "freenode sucks because > we've lost control of the official qemu channel" and "OFTC works > because we currently have active developers who control the official > qemu channel". so when control is lost on OFTC, where to next ? i > vote for EFnet.
No but it should be possible to ask the freenode team to drop the current owners, they shall see if it's not been worked on for a while. François.
