On 04/18/2018 07:03 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 18.04.2018 12:55, Halil Pasic wrote:On 04/15/2018 09:07 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:A new CPU model feature and two new CPU model facilities are introduced to support AP devices for a KVM guest.[..]diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c index 3b9e274..5ee3a2d 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c @@ -40,8 +40,10 @@ static const S390FeatDef s390_features[] = { FEAT_INIT("srs", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 9, "Sense-running-status facility"), FEAT_INIT("csske", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 10, "Conditional-SSKE facility"), FEAT_INIT("ctop", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 11, "Configuration-topology facility"), + FEAT_INIT("apqci", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 12, "Query AP Configuration facility"),Why did you change this form qci to apqci. Too may people found the qci good?If the facility is called "Query AP Configuration facility" it should be qapc Where does the term "qci" come from ?
It comes from the name of the function Query AP Configuration Information which
is identified by the initials QCI.
FEAT_INIT("ipter", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 13, "IPTE-range facility"), FEAT_INIT("nonqks", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 14, "Nonquiescing key-setting facility"), + FEAT_INIT("apft", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 15, "Adjunct Processor Facilities Test facility"), FEAT_INIT("etf2", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 16, "Extended-translation facility 2"), FEAT_INIT("msa-base", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 17, "Message-security-assist facility (excluding subfunctions)"), FEAT_INIT("ldisp", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 18, "Long-displacement facility"), @@ -129,6 +131,7 @@ static const S390FeatDef s390_features[] = { FEAT_INIT_MISC("dateh2", "DAT-enhancement facility 2"), FEAT_INIT_MISC("cmm", "Collaborative-memory-management facility"), + FEAT_INIT_MISC("ap", "AP facilities installed"),Why plural ('facilities')? Would not s/facilities/instructions be more end-user friendly? Regards, Halil
