On 04/06/2018 08:19 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > Notes: > > - Did not convert {num,max}_insns, since the corresponding code > will go away in the next patch. > > - ctx->pc becomes ctx->base.pc_next, and ctx->next_pc becomes ctx->pc_tmp.
Please call pc_tmp something meaningful, like pc_succ_insn, or pc_next_next. Cheers, Bastian