On 04/06/2018 08:19 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Notes:
> 
> - Did not convert {num,max}_insns, since the corresponding code
>   will go away in the next patch.
> 
> - ctx->pc becomes ctx->base.pc_next, and ctx->next_pc becomes ctx->pc_tmp.

Please call pc_tmp something meaningful, like pc_succ_insn, or pc_next_next.

Cheers,
Bastian


Reply via email to