On 09.04.2018 13:40, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 04/09/2018 01:36 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 09.04.2018 13:35, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 04/09/2018 01:30 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> Let's simplify it a bit. On some weird circumstances we would have tried >>>> to recompute watchpoints when running under KVM.
>>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> target/s390x/helper.c | 10 ++++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c >>>> index 615fa24ab9..e8548f340a 100644 >>>> --- a/target/s390x/helper.c >>>> +++ b/target/s390x/helper.c >>>> @@ -103,16 +103,18 @@ void load_psw(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t mask, >>>> uint64_t addr) >>>> >>>> env->psw.addr = addr; >>>> env->psw.mask = mask; >>>> - if (tcg_enabled()) { >>>> - env->cc_op = (mask >> 44) & 3; >>>> + >>>> + /* KVM will handle all WAITs and trigger a WAIT exit on disabled_wait >>>> */ >>>> + if (!tcg_enabled()) { >>>> + return; >>>> } >>>> + env->cc_op = (mask >> 44) & 3; >>> >>> Do we have any call path were KVM could call load_psw? >> >> do_restart_interrupt() >> >> SIGP while the target CPU is stopped. > > makes sense. Can you add that to the patch description? that makes it easier > to understand > what can really go wrong without this patch. Sure! Conny, when (and if ;) ) picking this up, can you change the description to "Let's simplify it a bit. On some weird circumstances we would have tried to recompute watchpoints when running under KVM. load_psw() is called from do_restart_interrupt() during a SIGP RESTART if the target CPU is STOPPED. Let's touch watchpoints only in the TCG case - where they are used for PER emulation." -- Thanks, David / dhildenb