On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:33:55 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> writes:
>
> > These are a few muladd-related operations that the original IBM syntax
> > does not specify; model files for these are in muladd.fptest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org>
(snip)
> > + case OP_MULADD_NEG_ADDEND:
> > + res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_c, s);
> > + break;
> > + case OP_MULADD_NEG_PRODUCT:
> > + res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_product,
> > s);
> > + break;
> > + case OP_MULADD_NEG_RESULT:
> > + res64 = float64_muladd(a, b, c, float_muladd_negate_result, s);
> > + break;
> > case OP_DIV:
> > res64 = float64_div(a, b, s);
> > break;
>
> Are there any intrinsics we could use for the hard variant which would
> be useful if we want to run under translation?
I don't know of any portable way of doing this. We could add some
arch-specific code though, suitably ifdef'ed.
E.
