> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Eric Blake" <ebl...@redhat.com>
> Sent Time: 2018-03-19 23:25:20 (Monday)
> To: "Su Hang" <suhan...@mails.ucas.ac.cn>, vsement...@virtuozzo.com
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Bug fix
> Having the commit message point to the commit id that introduced the bug
> is useful. The grammar is awkward (it sounds like the bug is that
> checkpatch.pl stopped complaining about the pattern, so the fix is to
> reinstate the complaint); better might be:
>
> Commit XYZ introduced a regression: checkpatch.pl started complaining
> about the following valid pattern:
> do {
> /* something */
> } while (condition);
>
> Fix the script to once again permit this pattern.
Thank you for correcting my mistakes. :-)
> Is this an updated revision to a patch posted earlier? If so, including
> 'v2' in the subject line (easy if you use 'git format-patch -v2' or 'git
> send-email -v2'), and then using this space after the --- separator to
> describe what changed since v1, makes life easier for reviewers.
Yes, it's an updated revision to a earlier patch.
But I wasn't about sending it, when I was using [ctrl + r] and [enter],
I send it accidentally.
Thanks for your kind suggestion.
Best,
Su Hang
