On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:01:38 +0100
Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> With the new "--nic" command line parameter option, the "old" way of
> specifying a NIC model via the nd_table[] is becoming more prominent
> again. But for the pseries "spapr-vlan" device, there is a confusing
> discrepancy between the model name that is used for "--device" (i.e.
> "spapr-vlan") and the model name that has to be used for "--net nic"
> or the new "--nic" parameter (i.e. "ibmveth"). Since "spapr-vlan" is
> the "real" name of the device, let's allow "spapr-vlan" to be used
> as model name for the nd_table[] entries, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 7e1c858..dfa9e43 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -2607,10 +2607,11 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
> NICInfo *nd = &nd_table[i];
>
> if (!nd->model) {
> - nd->model = g_strdup("ibmveth");
> + nd->model = g_strdup("spapr-vlan");
> }
>
> - if (strcmp(nd->model, "ibmveth") == 0) {
> + if (g_str_equal(nd->model, "spapr-vlan") ||
> + g_str_equal(nd->model, "ibmveth")) {
> spapr_vlan_create(spapr->vio_bus, nd);
> } else {
> pci_nic_init_nofail(&nd_table[i], phb->bus, nd->model, NULL);
