* Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> [2011-01-17 09:56:58]:

> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Arun R Bharadwaj
> <a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +static void threadlet_io_completion_signal_handler(int signum)
> > +{
> > +    qemu_service_io();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void threadlet_register_signal_handler(void)
> > +{
> > +    struct sigaction act;
> > +    sigfillset(&act.sa_mask);
> > +    act.sa_flags = 0; /* do not restart syscalls to interrupt select() */
> > +    act.sa_handler = threadlet_io_completion_signal_handler;
> > +    sigaction(SIGUSR2, &act, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void threadlet_init(void)
> > +{
> > +    threadlet_register_signal_handler();
> > +}
> 
> This would be the right place to create qemu-threadlet.c, instead of
> adding the thread_init() prototype to qemu-thread.h and then including
> that in vl.c.
> 
> Stefan

I did not follow your comment here. How can we avoid including
threadler_init() in vl.c?

-arun

Reply via email to