On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:02:15 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 10:54 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > It's already defined in cpu.h (to the same value) and not used in > > the sclp code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> > > --- > > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > > index 476cbf78f2..f9db243484 100644 > > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h > > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ > > #define SCLP_FC_ASSIGN_ATTACH_READ_STOR 0xE00000000000ULL > > #define SCLP_STARTING_SUBINCREMENT_ID 0x10001 > > #define SCLP_INCREMENT_UNIT 0x10000 > > -#define MAX_AVAIL_SLOTS 32 > > #define MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS 1020 > > > > /* CPU hotplug SCLP codes */ > > > Do we need this define and s390_get_memslot_count at all after removing > the hotplug code? > Indeed. Let's kill it with fire :)
